This Is A Spark Of Life.

"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of darkness."

Monthly Archives: April 2013

With Bags of Cash, C.I.A. Seeks Influence in Afghanistan

With Bags of Cash, C.I.A. Seeks Influence in Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan — For more than a decade, wads of American dollars packed into suitcases, backpacks and, on occasion, plastic shopping bags have been dropped off every month or so at the offices of Afghanistan’s president — courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency. 


All told, tens of millions of dollars have flowed from the C.I.A. to the office of President Hamid Karzai, according to current and former advisers to the Afghan leader.

“We called it ‘ghost money,’ ” said Khalil Roman, who served as Mr. Karzai’s deputy chief of staff from 2002 until 2005. “It came in secret, and it left in secret.”

The C.I.A., which declined to comment for this article, has long been known to support some relatives and close aides of Mr. Karzai. But the new accounts of off-the-books cash delivered directly to his office show payments on a vaster scale, and with a far greater impact on everyday governing.

Moreover, there is little evidence that the payments bought the influence the C.I.A. sought. Instead, some American officials said, the cash has fueled corruption and empowered warlords, undermining Washington’s exit strategy from Afghanistan.

“The biggest source of corruption in Afghanistan,” one American official said, “was the United States.”

The United States was not alone in delivering cash to the president. Mr. Karzai acknowledged a few years ago that Iran regularly gave bags of cash to one of his top aides.

At the time, in 2010, American officials jumped on the payments as evidence of an aggressive Iranian campaign to buy influence and poison Afghanistan’s relations with the United States. What they did not say was that the C.I.A. was also plying the presidential palace with cash — and unlike the Iranians, it still is.

American and Afghan officials familiar with the payments said the agency’s main goal in providing the cash has been to maintain access to Mr. Karzai and his inner circle and to guarantee the agency’s influence at the presidential palace, which wields tremendous power in Afghanistan’s highly centralized government. The officials spoke about the money only on the condition of anonymity.

It is not clear that the United States is getting what it pays for. Mr. Karzai’s willingness to defy the United States — and the Iranians, for that matter — on an array of issues seems to have only grown as the cash has piled up. Instead of securing his good graces, the payments may well illustrate the opposite: Mr. Karzai is seemingly unable to be bought.

Over Iran’s objections, he signed a strategic partnership deal with the United States last year, directly leading the Iranians to halt their payments, two senior Afghan officials said. Now, Mr. Karzai is seeking control over the Afghan militias raised by the C.I.A. to target operatives of Al Qaeda and insurgent commanders, potentially upending a critical part of the Obama administration’s plans for fighting militants as conventional military forces pull back this year.

But the C.I.A. has continued to pay, believing it needs Mr. Karzai’s ear to run its clandestine war against Al Qaeda and its allies, according to American and Afghan officials.

Like the Iranian cash, much of the C.I.A.’s money goes to paying off warlords and politicians, many of whom have ties to the drug trade and, in some cases, the Taliban. The result, American and Afghan officials said, is that the agency has greased the wheels of the same patronage networks that American diplomats and law enforcement agents have struggled unsuccessfully to dismantle, leaving the government in the grips of what are basically organized crime syndicates.

The cash does not appear to be subject to the oversight and restrictions placed on official American aid to the country or even the C.I.A.’s formal assistance programs, like financing Afghan intelligence agencies. And while there is no evidence that Mr. Karzai has personally taken any of the money — Afghan officials say the cash is handled by his National Security Council — the payments do in some cases work directly at odds with the aims of other parts of the American government in Afghanistan, even if they do not appear to violate American law.

Handing out cash has been standard procedure for the C.I.A. in Afghanistan since the start of the war. During the 2001 invasion, agency cash bought the services of numerous warlords, including Muhammad Qasim Fahim, the current first vice president.

“We paid them to overthrow the Taliban,” the American official said.

The C.I.A. then kept paying the Afghans to keep fighting. For instance, Mr. Karzai’s half brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, was paid by the C.I.A. to run the Kandahar Strike Force, a militia used by the agency to combat militants, until his assassination in 2011.

A number of senior officials on the Afghan National Security Council are also individually on the agency’s payroll, Afghan officials said.

While intelligence agencies often pay foreign officials to provide information, dropping off bags of cash at a foreign leader’s office to curry favor is a more unusual arrangement.

Afghan officials said the practice grew out of the unique circumstances in Afghanistan, where the United States built the government that Mr. Karzai runs. To accomplish that task, it had to bring to heel many of the warlords the C.I.A. had paid during and after the 2001 invasion.

By late 2002, Mr. Karzai and his aides were pressing for the payments to be routed through the president’s office, allowing him to buy the warlords’ loyalty, a former adviser to Mr. Karzai said. 

Then, in December 2002, Iranians showed up at the palace in a sport utility vehicle packed with cash, the former adviser said.

The C.I.A. began dropping off cash at the palace the following month, and the sums grew from there, Afghan officials said.

Payments ordinarily range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, the officials said, though none could provide exact figures. The money is used to cover a slew of off-the-books expenses, like paying off lawmakers or underwriting delicate diplomatic trips or informal negotiations.

Much of it also still goes to keeping old warlords in line. One is Abdul Rashid Dostum, an ethnic Uzbek whose militia served as a C.I.A. proxy force in 2001. He receives nearly $100,000 a month from the palace, two Afghan officials said. Other officials said the amount was significantly lower.

Mr. Dostum, who declined requests for comment, had previously said he was given $80,000 a month to serve as Mr. Karzai’s emissary in northern Afghanistan. “I asked for a year up front in cash so that I could build my dream house,” he was quoted as saying in a 2009 interview with Time magazine.

Some of the cash also probably ends up in the pockets of the Karzai aides who handle it, Afghan and Western officials said, though they would not identify any by name.

That is not a significant concern for the C.I.A., said American officials familiar with the agency’s operations. “They’ll work with criminals if they think they have to,” one American former official said.

Interestingly, the cash from Tehran appears to have been handled with greater transparency than the dollars from the C.I.A., Afghan officials said. The Iranian payments were routed through Mr. Karzai’s chief of staff. Some of the money was deposited in an account in the president’s name at a state-run bank, and some was kept at the palace. The sum delivered would then be announced at the next cabinet meeting. The Iranians gave $3 million to well over $10 million a year, Afghan officials said.

When word of the Iranian cash leaked out in October 2010, Mr. Karzai told reporters that he was grateful for it. He then added: “The United States is doing the same thing. They are providing cash to some of our offices.”

At the time, Mr. Karzai’s aides said he was referring to the billions in formal aid the United States gives. But the former adviser said in a recent interview that the president was in fact referring to the C.I.A.’s bags of cash.

No one mentions the agency’s money at cabinet meetings. It is handled by a small clique at the National Security Council, including its administrative chief, Mohammed Zia Salehi, Afghan officials said.

Mr. Salehi, though, is better known for being arrested in 2010 in connection with a sprawling, American-led investigation that tied together Afghan cash smuggling, Taliban finances and the opium trade. Mr. Karzai had him released within hours, and the C.I.A. then helped persuade the Obama administration to back off its anticorruption push, American officials said.

After his release, Mr. Salehi jokingly came up with a motto that succinctly summed up America’s conflicting priorities. He was, he began telling colleagues, “an enemy of the F.B.I., and a hero to the C.I.A.” 



Combat medic in Viet Nam speaks out against Jeff Bauman story.

By the way, the EMT guy’s original thread on the fairly popular (324 users online just now when I went there) bodybuilding forum has been reposted and linked to so many times that it now has close to243,000 views, BY FAR the most views of any thread on the whole forum: … p-Politics

‘Boston Bombing’ suspect’s uncle married top CIA man’s daughter.’ – Madcow


The CIA’s Graham Fuller, “whose daughter married the uncle of the ‘Boston Bombers'”.

The Boston bombers’ uncle married the daughter of Graham Fuller, a top CIA official

Daniel Hopsicker reports that uncle Ruslan Tsarnaev, was married to the daughter of former top CIA official Graham Fuller

Samantha Tsarnaev.

Graham Fuller, according to the New York Times, encouraged theReagan Administration to sell weapons to the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran.

This was known as the Iran-Contra Affair.”[3][4]

Fuller’s ‘document‘ suggested that the USA should continue to be friends with Iran, in order to counter Russia.

Ruslan Tsarni, known as Ruslan Tsarnaev, married the daughter of former top CIA officer Graham Fuller who, in 1986, became the Vice-Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, with overall responsibility for national level strategic forecasting.

Ruslan is the uncle of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the alleged Boston bombers.

Ruslan Tsarnaev met and married Samantha Ankara Fuller sometime in the early 1990’s, while she was a graduate student in North Carolina, and he was in law school at Duke.

The couple divorced sometime before 2004.
On Sibel Edmonds’ State Secrets Privilege Gallery, Graham Fuller was listed as one of the American Deep State rogues.

Uncle Ruslan Tsarnaev, who worked for the CIA front known as USAID.

Uncle Ruslan Tsarnaev and the CIA’s Graham Fuller may have been in business together.

Ruslan once worked for a Halliburton company “used as a front to obtain oil contracts from the Kazakh State”.

Ruslan Tsarni “was implicated in an investigation involving the laundering and theft of $6 billion.”

THE most damning (so far) of Boom Boom Bauman and Cowboy’s shenanigans:

THE most damning (so far) of Boom Boom Bauman and Cowboy’s shenanigans:

full link:
It seems he had a wardrobe/prop malfuntion that was caught on video……so there were multiple “takes” of his wheel-chaired exit from the event.

Source: CluesForum

Boston ‘Perp-Spectives’ – CluesForum


I’ve had some more fun with this “Boston-Bombing” computer imagery. Fascinating stuff!

So here’s a 2009 Goo-gle maps view of Boylston street – past the finish line and looking down towards the “bomb area”:


Here’s an image purportedly snapped on ‘bombing day’. I’ve just drawn an “A<—>B” vector between two given points:
Image … istan.html

Here’s another purported picture of ‘bombing day’. Compare “A<—>B” vector with the image above. Just a question of deceptive perspectives / focal distorsion, perhaps? Hmm, I’d say that’s highly doubtful – but let’s get on. Next, I have a question for Bostoners: What exactly are we seeing down in the distance there, at upper left ? (area marked ^^^?^^^)

See, here’s a Goo-gle map photo from 2009. So my simple question is: has this city-view changed this much since then?
I find it rather unlikely – what with that antique building/rooftop (a church?)- but Im quite happy to stand corrected.

Lastly, here’s the funniest thing: I tried stacking cars upon each other on this other Goo-gle map view – but I needed only three of them to get up this high (compare with the five police cars in above image). Of course, I copy-pasted cars from within both images – so as to respect all relative proportions:


Source: CluesForum

The real “masterpieces” are on the “Jeff Bauman” Fakebook – Fake Photos – Boston Bombing PsyOps

It really makes no difference whether the “Jeff Bauman” character might be rendered over/played by an actor in some form later or not; the fact remains that the fabricated entity being literally sold to the public is obviously non-existent.

Their real “masterpieces” are on the “Jeff Bauman” Fakebook: :-

Image … 643a.71525 … 17b7.47238
▲What’s happened to the left thumb? And how can a light reflection/beam from the window behind “him” show in front of the sleeve?

More on “Auntie’s” page (mixed bag of shoop rainbows), oh so real :rolleyes: : :-

Image … 428.163820 ____________________________[“fairy lights” ▲]

Creepy arm! … 5ac.104248

Image … ca3.134183

To familiarize yourself with just how realistic CGI images can be made to look, check these out (click on any image for full size):

Source: CluesForum

So we are asked to believe that these individuals are all the same Jeff Bauman? – CluesForum

So we are asked to believe that these individuals are all the same Jeff Bauman?

ImageImage … g-suspect/

Image … ?mobile=nc


He sure does love that shirt, doesn’t he? :rolleyes:

Source: CluesForum

So we are asked to believe that these individuals are all the same Jeff Bauman? – Boston Bombing Hoax

So we are asked to believe that these individuals are all the same Jeff Bauman?

ImageImage … g-suspect/

Image … ?mobile=nc


He sure does love that shirt, doesn’t he? :rolleyes:

DISINFO/DIVERSION ALERT! – Boston Bombings were ‘Faked’ not ‘Staged’


Please be aware that the PsyOp perpetrators’ most effective defense weapon is WORDS, i.e. conceptual meanings and connotations.

It is now abundantly evident that the buzz-bomb word the controlled disinfo clowns are using to confuse & protect the Boston Hoax from exposure now is “staged” — we must avoid it.

Note: The alleged “EMT” quoted previously, not only promoted the “staged” with “actors” story but didn’t even clarify the critical time factor for femoral artery bleed out=death. The medical sources and specific military study I cited stated “45 seconds”.

This operation was clearly FAKED, not “staged” in the normal sense with pre-filmed “live actors” playing “bomb victims” (as reinforced via “Reality TV” & “training drills”), but entirely pre-fabricatedwith CGI video techniques (layering, compositing, rendering) from templates & motion capture software. So any “actors” are very few; only appearing/heard afterwards in contrived “interviews” to give credence to the animated movie clips and composite “photos” — which probably also include “Avatar-style” rendering disguise. e.g. the “Gabby Giffords” S1m0ne!

Remember, the first casualty in these attacks on our social/cultural perceptions is language: terms and meanings are hijacked to steer and corral all doubters into easily dismissed “loony” associations; e.g. “conspiracy theorist”, “no-planer”, “truther”, “inside job”, “false flag”, etc.

It is important to understand why clear, comprehensible language is used when discussing this info — not only for literate credibility, but to comprehend the insidious purpose of parroting propagandised terms.

Let’s choose our words with care and remain vigilant to keep our investigations on track :)

Source: CluesForum

Who is sprinkling dust on the victims in Boston ?? – CluesForum